A column of ideas we should not adopt, for our national sanity.
Whitewashing - The Second Time

But we're talking about marketing a novel. The cover is the only image, the only "logo" or representation most see of a book. If a girl's face is our only visual, it should be spelled out so that we don't have to question or second-guess it. The karmic touch is how shrouded the girl is, as if she's hiding something beneath her hair; and beneath the cover, readers might be surprised to learn about the (forgive the expression) white elephant in the room. It's not as if, in the digital age, nobody would notice the disjunction and set off blogging about it.
Fine. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice?

On one hand, why waste space criticizing a cover that screams "Harlequin bodice ripper"? But on the other, this can't be a mistake. The marketing staff at the publisher must have known they were intentionally misrepresenting the book. Did they hold a conversation in which it was decided that white women are more market-friendly? Oprah and Tyler Perry would disagree.
We've all seen misleading movie trailers. Book jacket synopses that barely allude to the plot. But a cover is part of the reading experience: a marketing poster but also genuine iconography for a work's themes or characters. Even beyond racial sensitivity, to think the readers won't notice the incongruity reeks more of smoke and mirrors than magic.
No comments:
Post a Comment